I chose to read a book on grading this summer as part of the study of school leaving -
A Repair Kit for Grading: 15 Fixes for Broken Grades. It has me rethinking some of the grading practices that I used for years as a teacher. For example, I gave zero's, averaged in participation grades, and reduced scores when assignments were late. I organized my gradebook in categories: homework, tests, quizzes, writing assignments, participation. Ken O'Connor presents convincing arguements why these and others may not be the best practices because they do not result in grades that represent learning. Sometimes I think he's right on; sometimes I'm not sure. Here are a few of the 15 "fixes":
1. Don’t include student behaviors (effort, participation, adherence to class rules, etc.) in grades; include only achievement.
2. Don’t reduce marks on “work” submitted late; provide support for the learner.
7. Don’t organize information in grading records by assessment methods or simply summarize into a single grade; organize and report evidence by standards/learning goals.
12. Don’t include zeros in grade determination when evidence is missing or as punishment; use alternatives, such as reassessing to determine real achievement or use “I” for Incomplete or Insufficient Evidence.
13. Don’t use information from formative assessments and practice to determine grades; use only summative evidence.
15. Don’t leave students out of the grading process. Involve students; they can – and should – play key roles in assessment and grading that promote achievement.
I would love to hear people's thoughts about these statements. I will facilitate a discussion of grading practices at LINKS this year. Please join me! (LINKS 10 is at Afton Central School this year on August 5-7.)